Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X vs Fujifilm XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR: full comparison
The Nokton 35mm F1.2 X leads on more of the measurable specs, but the XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR counters on autofocus at all, where the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X is manual focus only and weather sealing.
The short version
The Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X and Fujifilm XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR are two X-mount primes at different focal lengths — the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X (52.5mm equivalent) and the XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR (50mm equivalent). Both were introduced in 2021.
On the spec sheet the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X pulls ahead with a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture, a lighter 196g body, and a more compact 39.8 mm barrel, plus a couple of smaller edges.
The XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR answers with autofocus at all, where the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X is manual focus only and weather sealing.
So which one? Start with the focal length you actually want to shoot: the 52.5mm-equivalent Nokton 35mm F1.2 X or the 50mm-equivalent XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR. Once that's settled, Nokton 35mm F1.2 X has the edge on the specs above.
Where the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X wins
- +a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture
- +a lighter 196g body
- +a more compact 39.8 mm barrel
- +a 12-blade diaphragm
Where the XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR wins
- +autofocus at all, where the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X is manual focus only
- +weather sealing
Who should buy the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X or XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR?
Buy the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X if…
Pick the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X if a brighter f/1.2 maximum aperture and a lighter 196g body matter to you. Photographers who already enjoy manual focus and want the fastest, most tactile normal prime in the mount, particularly on an X-Pro body. Read the full Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review for the details.
Buy the XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR if…
Pick the XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR if autofocus at all, where the Nokton 35mm F1.2 X is manual focus only and weather sealing matter to you. Photographers who want one current normal prime on the camera most of the time, and who need the autofocus to keep up with people who move. Read the full XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR review for the details.
Nokton 35mm F1.2 X vs XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR: pros and cons
| Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X | Fujifilm XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review and XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR review.
Nokton 35mm F1.2 X vs XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR: full specs
| Spec | Nokton 35mm F1.2 X 35 mm · f/1.2 · 196g | XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR 33 mm · f/1.4 · 360g |
|---|---|---|
| Optical | ||
| Focal length | 35 mm | 33 mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 52.5 mm | 50 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.2 | f/1.4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Optical construction | 8 elements in 6 groups | 15 elements in 10 groups |
| Special elements | 1 abnormal partial dispersion element | 2 aspherical elements and 3 extra-low-dispersion elements |
| Aperture blades | 12 | 9 |
| Focus & Stabilization | ||
| Min. focus distance | 0.30 m | 0.30 m |
| Max. magnification | — | 0.15× |
| Autofocus motor | Manual focus only | Linear motor |
| Optical stabilization | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Filter thread | 46 mm | 58 mm |
| Diameter × length | 59.6 × 39.8 mm | 67 × 73.5 mm |
| Weight | 196g | 360g |
| Weather sealing | No | Yes |
| Min. operating temp | — | -10 °C |
| General | ||
| Announced | 2021-07-15 | 2021-09-02 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from the manufacturers' public product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each lens, see the Voigtländer Nokton 35mm F1.2 X review and the Fujifilm XF 33mm F1.4 R LM WR review. Each carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where the lens sits in the X-mount lineup.