Fujifilm X-E2 vs X-M1: full comparison
The X-E2 leads on more headline specs, but the X-M1 counters on a lighter 330g body.
Also searched as XE2 vs XM1, and in the other order as XM1 vs XE2.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-E2 and Fujifilm X-M1 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-E and the X-M. Both launched in 2013. At launch the X-E2 was 999 USD and the X-M1 699 USD, making the X-M1 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-E2 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 7 fps continuous shooting, 1080p/60p video, and a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder.
The X-M1 isn't far behind. It hits back with a lighter 330g body.
So which one? If you want 7 fps continuous shooting, get the X-E2. If a lighter 330g body is closer to what you actually need, the X-M1 is the smarter buy. And the X-M1 costs less — 699 USD at launch.
Where the X-E2 wins
- +7 fps continuous shooting
- +1080p/60p video
- +a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder
Where the X-M1 wins
- +a lighter 330g body
Who should buy the X-E2 or X-M1?
Buy the X-E2 if…
Pick the X-E2 if 7 fps continuous shooting, 1080p/60p video matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-E handling. Read the full X-E2 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-M1 if…
Pick the X-M1 if a lighter 330g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 699 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-M handling. Read the full X-M1 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-E2 vs X-M1: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-E2 | Fujifilm X-M1 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-E2 review and X-M1 review.
X-E2 vs X-M1: full specs
| Spec |  X-E22013 · $999 |  X-M12013 · $699 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Launch price | 999 USD | 699 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 16.3 MP | 16.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans II | X-Trans I |
| Processor | EXR Processor II | EXR Processor II |
| ISO range | 200–6400 | 200–6400 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 49 | 49 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 7 | 5.6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 1080p 30p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | None |
| LCD | 3" fixed | 3" tilt |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 350g | 330g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126 | NP-W126 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 350 shots | 350 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-E2 review and the Fujifilm X-M1 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.