Fujifilm X-T100 vs XF10: full comparison
The X-T100 leads on more headline specs, but the XF10 counters on a lighter 279g body.
Also searched as XT100 vs XF10, and in the other order as XF10 vs XT100.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-T100 and Fujifilm XF10 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-T and the XF10. Both launched in 2018. At launch the X-T100 was 599 USD and the XF10 499 USD, making the XF10 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-T100 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder and 430-shot battery life.
The XF10 isn't far behind. It hits back with a lighter 279g body.
So which one? If you want a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder, get the X-T100. If a lighter 279g body is closer to what you actually need, the XF10 is the smarter buy. And the XF10 costs less — 499 USD at launch.
Where the X-T100 wins
- +a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder
- +430-shot battery life
Where the XF10 wins
- +a lighter 279g body
Who should buy the X-T100 or XF10?
Buy the X-T100 if…
Pick the X-T100 if a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder, 430-shot battery life matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T100 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the XF10 if…
Pick the XF10 if a lighter 279g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 499 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward XF10 handling. Read the full XF10 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-T100 vs XF10: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-T100 | Fujifilm XF10 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-T100 review and XF10 review.
X-T100 vs XF10: full specs
| Spec |  X-T1002018 · $599 |  XF102018 · $499 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Launch price | 599 USD | 499 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.2 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | Bayer | Bayer |
| Processor | EXR Processor II | Unnamed Bayer engine |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 91 | 91 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 6 | 6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 15p | 4K 15p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | None |
| LCD | 3" tilt touch | 3" fixed touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 448g | 279g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-95 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 430 shots | 330 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 6 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-T100 review and the Fujifilm XF10 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.