Fujifilm X-T200 vs X-T100: full comparison
The X-T200 leads on more headline specs, but the X-T100 counters on 430-shot battery life.
Also searched as XT200 vs XT100, and in the other order as XT100 vs XT200.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-T200 and Fujifilm X-T100 are both Fujifilm X-T bodies. The X-T200 is the newer of the two, arriving in 2020. At launch the X-T200 was 799 USD and the X-T100 599 USD, making the X-T100 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-T200 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 8 fps continuous shooting, 4K/30p video, and a lighter 370g body.
The X-T100 isn't far behind. It hits back with 430-shot battery life.
So which one? If you want 8 fps continuous shooting, get the X-T200. If 430-shot battery life is closer to what you actually need, the X-T100 is the smarter buy. And the X-T100 costs less — 599 USD at launch.
Where the X-T200 wins
- +8 fps continuous shooting
- +4K/30p video
- +a lighter 370g body
Where the X-T100 wins
- +430-shot battery life
Who should buy the X-T200 or X-T100?
Buy the X-T200 if…
Pick the X-T200 if 8 fps continuous shooting, 4K/30p video matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T200 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-T100 if…
Pick the X-T100 if 430-shot battery life matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 599 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T100 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-T200 vs X-T100: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Fujifilm X-T100 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-T200 review and X-T100 review.
X-T200 vs X-T100: full specs
| Spec |  X-T2002020 · $799 |  X-T1002018 · $599 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2020 | 2018 |
| Launch price | 799 USD | 599 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.2 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | Bayer | Bayer |
| Processor | Unnamed Bayer engine | EXR Processor II |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 91 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 30p | 4K 15p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3.5" flip touch | 3" tilt touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 370g | 448g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 270 shots | 430 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 6 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-T200 review and the Fujifilm X-T100 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.