Fujifilm X-T5 vs X100VI: full comparison
The X-T5 leads on more headline specs, but the X100VI counters on a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder and a lighter 521g body.
Also searched as XT5 vs X100VI, and in the other order as X100VI vs XT5.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-T5 and Fujifilm X100VI are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-T and the X100. The X100VI is the newer of the two, arriving in 2024. At launch the X-T5 was 1,699 USD and the X100VI 1,599 USD, making the X100VI the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-T5 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 15 fps continuous shooting, 7-stop in-body stabilization, and 580-shot battery life, with a few smaller wins on top of that.
The X100VI isn't far behind. It hits back with a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder and a lighter 521g body.
So which one? If you want 15 fps continuous shooting, get the X-T5. If a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder is closer to what you actually need, the X100VI is the smarter buy. And the X100VI costs less — 1,599 USD at launch.
Where the X-T5 wins
- +15 fps continuous shooting
- +7-stop in-body stabilization
- +580-shot battery life
- +weather sealing
- +2 card slots
Where the X100VI wins
- +a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
- +a lighter 521g body
Who should buy the X-T5 or X100VI?
Buy the X-T5 if…
Pick the X-T5 if 15 fps continuous shooting, 7-stop in-body stabilization matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T5 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X100VI if…
Pick the X100VI if a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, a lighter 521g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 1,599 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100VI review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-T5 vs X100VI: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-T5 | Fujifilm X100VI |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-T5 review and X100VI review.
X-T5 vs X100VI: full specs
| Spec | 2022 · $1,699 | 2024 · $1,599 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2022 | 2024 |
| Launch price | 1,699 USD | 1,599 USD |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 40.2 MP | 40.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans V | X-Trans V |
| Processor | X-Processor 5 | X-Processor 5 |
| ISO range | 125–12800 | 125–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 425 |
| Subject detection | ai | ai |
| Burst (fps) | 15 | 11 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 6K 30p | 6K 30p |
| Codec | H.265, H.264 | H.265, H.264 |
| Log profile | F-Log2 | F-Log2 |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | 7 stops | 6 stops |
| Viewfinder | EVF (3.69M dot) | Hybrid OVF/EVF (3.69M dot) |
| LCD | 3" tilt touch | 3" tilt touch |
| Weather sealed | Yes | No |
| Weight | 557g | 521g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-II / SD UHS-II | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W235 | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 580 shots | 450 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 8 | 8 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-T5 review and the Fujifilm X100VI review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.
Further reading
Quick Switching between Color and B&W profiles on Fuji bodies
The Nikon Zf has a B&W switch. You can build the same thing on a Fuji: FS slots on the film simulation dial, or a Recall C1 button on everything else.
How to get phone-like HDR photos from a Fujifilm camera
Your phone takes eight dark photos and averages them. Here are five ways to get the same result on a Fuji, explained from scratch with no jargon.
Why I prefer Fujifilm APS-C over GFX medium format
GFX wins on resolution and dynamic range. APS-C wins on depth of field, fast glass, reach, weight, and price. Here is the full trade-off, with the numbers.