Fujifilm X100V vs X100F: full comparison
The X100V leads on more headline specs, but the X100F counters on a lighter 469g body.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X100V and Fujifilm X100F are both Fujifilm X100 bodies. The X100V is the newer of the two, arriving in 2020. At launch the X100V was 1,399 USD and the X100F 1,299 USD, making the X100F the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X100V is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 26.1 MP of resolution, 11 fps continuous shooting, and face/eye-detection AF, with a few smaller wins on top of that.
The X100F isn't far behind. It hits back with a lighter 469g body.
So which one? If you want 26.1 MP of resolution, get the X100V. If a lighter 469g body is closer to what you actually need, the X100F is the smarter buy. And the X100F costs less — 1,299 USD at launch.
Where the X100V wins
- +26.1 MP of resolution
- +11 fps continuous shooting
- +face/eye-detection AF
- +4K/30p video
- +a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
- +420-shot battery life
Where the X100F wins
- +a lighter 469g body
Who should buy the X100V or X100F?
Buy the X100V if…
Pick the X100V if 26.1 MP of resolution, 11 fps continuous shooting matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100V review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X100F if…
Pick the X100F if a lighter 469g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 1,299 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100F review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X100V vs X100F: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X100V | Fujifilm X100F |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X100V review and X100F review.
X100V vs X100F: full specs
| Spec |  X100V2020 · $1,399 |  X100F2017 · $1,299 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2020 | 2017 |
| Launch price | 1,399 USD | 1,299 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 26.1 MP | 24.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans IV | X-Trans III |
| Processor | X-Processor 4 | X-Processor Pro |
| ISO range | 160–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 325 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | none |
| Burst (fps) | 11 | 8 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 30p | 1080p 60p |
| Codec | H.265, H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | F-Log | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Hybrid OVF/EVF (3.69M dot) | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" tilt touch | 3" fixed |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 478g | 469g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 420 shots | 270 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 7 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X100V review and the Fujifilm X100F review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.
Further reading
X100VI vs Leica Q3 and Q3 43: what the money buys
The Q3 43's 43mm f/2 is the Leica closest to the X100VI's 35mm view, and at matched framing the maths says almost two stops. Here is what the other 6,351 USD buys.
X100VI vs GFX100RF: why I would take the APS-C one
The RF's 35mm f/4 works out to an equivalent f/3.2. The X100VI's 23mm f/2 works out to f/3.0. Same look, $3,300 apart.