Fujifilm X-T1 vs X100T: full comparison
The X-T1 leads on more headline specs, but the X100T counters on a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder.
Also searched as XT1 vs X100T, and in the other order as X100T vs XT1.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-T1 and Fujifilm X100T are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-T and the X100. Both launched in 2014. Both launched at 1,299 USD.
On paper the X-T1 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 8 fps continuous shooting, 350-shot battery life, and weather sealing.
The X100T isn't far behind. It hits back with a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder.
So which one? If you want 8 fps continuous shooting, get the X-T1. If a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder is closer to what you actually need, the X100T is the smarter buy.
Where the X-T1 wins
- +8 fps continuous shooting
- +350-shot battery life
- +weather sealing
Where the X100T wins
- +a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
Who should buy the X-T1 or X100T?
Buy the X-T1 if…
Pick the X-T1 if 8 fps continuous shooting, 350-shot battery life matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T1 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X100T if…
Pick the X100T if a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100T review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-T1 vs X100T: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-T1 | Fujifilm X100T |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-T1 review and X100T review.
X-T1 vs X100T: full specs
| Spec | 2014 · $1,299 | 2014 · $1,299 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2014 | 2014 |
| Launch price | 1,299 USD | 1,299 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 16.3 MP | 16.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans II | X-Trans II |
| Processor | EXR Processor II | EXR Processor II |
| ISO range | 200–6400 | 200–6400 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 77 | 49 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 1080p 60p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" tilt | 3" fixed |
| Weather sealed | Yes | No |
| Weight | 440g | 440g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-II | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126 | NP-95 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 350 shots | 330 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 4 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-T1 review and the Fujifilm X100T review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.