Fujifilm X100S vs X100T: full comparison
The X100T leads on more headline specs, but the X100S counters on price and size.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X100S and Fujifilm X100T are both Fujifilm X100 bodies. The X100T is the newer of the two, arriving in 2014. Both launched at 1,299 USD.
The X100S doesn't win any of the headline spec categories outright. Its case is price, size, and how it feels in your hand, not the numbers.
The X100T isn't far behind. It hits back with a lighter 440g body.
So which one? If you want the more capable all-rounder, get the X100S. If a lighter 440g body is closer to what you actually need, the X100T is the smarter buy.
Where the X100S wins
No clear wins on the headline specs — its case is price, size, or feel.
Where the X100T wins
- +a lighter 440g body
Who should buy the X100S or X100T?
Buy the X100S if…
If you already shoot Fuji and just want the cheaper available body, the X100S is the practical pick. Read the full X100S review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X100T if…
Pick the X100T if a lighter 440g body matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100T review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X100S vs X100T: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X100S | Fujifilm X100T |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X100S review and X100T review.
X100S vs X100T: full specs
| Spec |  X100S2013 · $1,299 |  X100T2014 · $1,299 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2013 | 2014 |
| Launch price | 1,299 USD | 1,299 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 16.3 MP | 16.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans II | X-Trans II |
| Processor | EXR Processor II | EXR Processor II |
| ISO range | 200–6400 | 200–6400 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 49 | 49 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 6 | 6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 1080p 60p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 2.8" fixed | 3" fixed |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 445g | 440g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-95 | NP-95 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 330 shots | 330 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X100S review and the Fujifilm X100T review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.
Further reading
X100VI vs GFX100RF: why I would take the APS-C one
The RF's 35mm f/4 works out to an equivalent f/3.2. The X100VI's 23mm f/2 works out to f/3.0. Same look, $3,300 apart.