Fujifilm X100F vs X100T: full comparison
The X100F and X100T are closely matched — the right pick comes down to what you shoot.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X100F and Fujifilm X100T are both Fujifilm X100 bodies. The X100F is the newer of the two, arriving in 2017. Both launched at 1,299 USD.
On paper the X100F is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 24.3 MP of resolution and 8 fps continuous shooting.
The X100T isn't far behind. It hits back with 330-shot battery life and a lighter 440g body.
So which one? If you want 24.3 MP of resolution, get the X100F. If 330-shot battery life is closer to what you actually need, the X100T is the smarter buy.
Where the X100F wins
- +24.3 MP of resolution
- +8 fps continuous shooting
Where the X100T wins
- +330-shot battery life
- +a lighter 440g body
Who should buy the X100F or X100T?
Buy the X100F if…
Pick the X100F if 24.3 MP of resolution, 8 fps continuous shooting matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100F review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X100T if…
Pick the X100T if 330-shot battery life, a lighter 440g body matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100T review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X100F vs X100T: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X100F | Fujifilm X100T |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X100F review and X100T review.
X100F vs X100T: full specs
| Spec | 2017 · $1,299 | 2014 · $1,299 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2017 | 2014 |
| Launch price | 1,299 USD | 1,299 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.3 MP | 16.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans III | X-Trans II |
| Processor | X-Processor Pro | EXR Processor II |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 200–6400 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 325 | 49 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 6 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 1080p 60p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" fixed | 3" fixed |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 469g | 440g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-95 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 270 shots | 330 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X100F review and the Fujifilm X100T review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.
Further reading
X100VI vs GFX100RF: why I would take the APS-C one
The RF's 35mm f/4 works out to an equivalent f/3.2. The X100VI's 23mm f/2 works out to f/3.0. Same look, $3,300 apart.