Fujifilm X100F vs X100: full comparison
The X100F leads on more headline specs, but the X100 counters on 300-shot battery life and a lighter 445g body.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X100F and Fujifilm X100 are both Fujifilm X100 bodies. The X100F is the newer of the two, arriving in 2017. At launch the X100F was 1,299 USD and the X100 1,199 USD, making the X100 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X100F is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 24.3 MP of resolution, 8 fps continuous shooting, and 1080p/60p video, with a few smaller wins on top of that.
The X100 isn't far behind. It hits back with 300-shot battery life and a lighter 445g body.
So which one? If you want 24.3 MP of resolution, get the X100F. If 300-shot battery life is closer to what you actually need, the X100 is the smarter buy. And the X100 costs less — 1,199 USD at launch.
Where the X100F wins
- +24.3 MP of resolution
- +8 fps continuous shooting
- +1080p/60p video
- +a hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
Where the X100 wins
- +300-shot battery life
- +a lighter 445g body
Who should buy the X100F or X100?
Buy the X100F if…
Pick the X100F if 24.3 MP of resolution, 8 fps continuous shooting matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100F review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X100 if…
Pick the X100 if 300-shot battery life, a lighter 445g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 1,199 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X100 handling. Read the full X100 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X100F vs X100: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X100F | Fujifilm X100 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X100F review and X100 review.
X100F vs X100: full specs
| Spec | 2017 · $1,299 | 2011 · $1,199 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2017 | 2011 |
| Launch price | 1,299 USD | 1,199 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 24.3 MP | 12.3 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans III | Bayer |
| Processor | X-Processor Pro | EXR Processor |
| ISO range | 200–12800 | 200–6400 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 325 | 49 |
| Subject detection | none | none |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 5 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 1080p 60p | 720p 24p |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Hybrid OVF/EVF (2.36M dot) | Hybrid OVF/EVF (1.44M dot) |
| LCD | 3" fixed | 2.8" fixed |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 469g | 445g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-95 |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 270 shots | 300 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 5 | 4 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X100F review and the Fujifilm X100 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.
Further reading
X100VI vs GFX100RF: why I would take the APS-C one
The RF's 35mm f/4 works out to an equivalent f/3.2. The X100VI's 23mm f/2 works out to f/3.0. Same look, $3,300 apart.