Fujifilm X-S10 vs X-T200: full comparison
The X-S10 leads on more headline specs, but the X-T200 counters on a lighter 370g body.
Also searched as XS10 vs XT200, and in the other order as XT200 vs XS10.
Not sure which one fits? Take the Fujifilm camera quiz and we will score both bodies against your answers.
The short version
The Fujifilm X-S10 and Fujifilm X-T200 are Fujifilm APS-C bodies from different lines — the X-S and the X-T. Both launched in 2020. At launch the X-S10 was 999 USD and the X-T200 799 USD, making the X-T200 the more affordable of the two.
On paper the X-S10 is the stronger body of the two. It gives you 26.1 MP of resolution, 6-stop in-body stabilization, and 325-shot battery life.
The X-T200 isn't far behind. It hits back with a lighter 370g body.
So which one? If you want 26.1 MP of resolution, get the X-S10. If a lighter 370g body is closer to what you actually need, the X-T200 is the smarter buy. And the X-T200 costs less — 799 USD at launch.
Where the X-S10 wins
- +26.1 MP of resolution
- +6-stop in-body stabilization
- +325-shot battery life
Where the X-T200 wins
- +a lighter 370g body
Who should buy the X-S10 or X-T200?
Buy the X-S10 if…
Pick the X-S10 if 26.1 MP of resolution, 6-stop in-body stabilization matters to you. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-S handling. Read the full X-S10 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
Buy the X-T200 if…
Pick the X-T200 if a lighter 370g body matters to you. It also launched cheaper at 799 USD. It is the better fit for buyers who already lean toward X-T handling. Read the full X-T200 review for the use-case-specific pros and cons.
X-S10 vs X-T200: pros and cons
| Fujifilm X-S10 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Pros and cons mirror the in-house X-S10 review and X-T200 review.
X-S10 vs X-T200: full specs
| Spec |  X-S102020 · $999 |  X-T2002020 · $799 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Release year | 2020 | 2020 |
| Launch price | 999 USD | 799 USD |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Sensor & Image | ||
| Megapixels | 26.1 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor generation | X-Trans IV | Bayer |
| Processor | X-Processor 4 | Unnamed Bayer engine |
| ISO range | 160–12800 | 200–12800 |
| Autofocus & Burst | ||
| AF points | 425 | 425 |
| Subject detection | face-eye | face-eye |
| Burst (fps) | 8 | 8 |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 4K 30p | 4K 30p |
| Codec | H.265, H.264 | H.264 |
| Log profile | F-Log | No |
| Physical | ||
| Stabilization | 6 stops | None |
| Viewfinder | EVF (2.36M dot) | EVF (2.36M dot) |
| LCD | 3" flip touch | 3.5" flip touch |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Weight | 465g | 370g |
| Storage | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Card types | SD UHS-I | SD UHS-I |
| Power | ||
| Battery | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 325 shots | 270 shots |
| Software | ||
| Film sims | 7 | 5 |
Highlighted cells are best in class between these two. Specs sourced from public Fujifilm product pages.
In-depth reviews
For the full long-form review of each camera, see the Fujifilm X-S10 review and the Fujifilm X-T200 review. Each one carries the full spec breakdown, pros and cons, and where this body sits in the current Fujifilm lineup.